I guess this is a growing movement. I heard some about this
from a recent podcast and really have been dealing with it ever since I have
been trying to be in some sort of organized atheist movement back in 2009. I
see flames and arrows going back and forth. It is odd that when compared to the
mountain of religious issues we have to deal with as atheist that how you act
as an atheist is really becoming such a major issue.
But as I have learned, no two atheists are the same. Here are some concepts I “believe in as an atheist.
But as I have learned, no two atheists are the same. Here are some concepts I “believe in as an atheist.
Me and "Jesus" Reason Rally |
·
I believe that according to the Constitution
that the right to bear arms should not be infringed, but in keeping with the
Constitution they should also be regulated.
·
I believe abortion is non-negotiable option for
woman and that it is a right inalienable to all women.
·
I believe that the right for labor to organized
as a sacred as the right to vote and should be encouraged and supported
·
I believe that the global climate is changing;
however I have yet to see conclusive evidence that shows humans are the primary
or significant cause.
·
I believe that food ‘lifestyles” such as vegetarian,
vegan, raw food, organic and etc. are simply a way for people to have a “one-upmanship”
toward other people that do not share their view. No data or study has
concluded that any on these diets are healthier than any other reasonable diet.
·
I believe that one of the major purposes of the government
is to “provide for the General Welfare”, which means that as citizens we are
obligated to support our country with our taxes. This means those that benefit
most have a greater burden to serve the country with the prosperity.
·
I believe that when able, a person should help
others and leave people alone when harm could result. TO me, one example is
donating blood.
·
I think it is reasonable and responsible to recycle,
and conserve energy, to dispose of waste properly and do your best to care for
the environment.
·
I believe that gender equality is required and
respect is the norm. As men and woman, we have many interactions, the goal is
to make them positive, and make it right when we make mistakes.
Hemant Mehta FreeOK |
·
I believe that human sexuality should not be a
barrier to forming legal relationships with consenting adults. Marriage is a
legal contract and as long as the parties agree, government has no business
intervening.
None of these
views are dependent or driven because I am an atheist. None of them are related
to me having a past history as an evangelical Christian. I know atheists that
have opposite views of each and every view I share. Does that mean we have
nothing in common, of course not. It means we are a group of dynamic people
that have a manifold of views that represent about every idea and concept of
human existence. Should we alienate someone because they do not share our view
on promoting our concepts concerning God and the supernatural?
I recall in 2010 at the Skeptic on III conference a panel discussion concerning accomidationalists and confrontationalists. This was the first time I had come across these concepts. However, it wasn’t the first time I had dealt with them. In 2009, when living in Ponca City, OK, I and a friend started a meet up group called Northern Oklahoma Freethinkers. By the second meeting we already had divisions starting. Those members that wanted to “bash” religion and those that just wanted to talk about science and positive concepts. There were those that felt that being a atheist meant you were associated with a certain political party.
I
I recall in 2010 at the Skeptic on III conference a panel discussion concerning accomidationalists and confrontationalists. This was the first time I had come across these concepts. However, it wasn’t the first time I had dealt with them. In 2009, when living in Ponca City, OK, I and a friend started a meet up group called Northern Oklahoma Freethinkers. By the second meeting we already had divisions starting. Those members that wanted to “bash” religion and those that just wanted to talk about science and positive concepts. There were those that felt that being a atheist meant you were associated with a certain political party.
I
PZ Myers, Richard Carrier and D.J. Grothe, Skepticon III |
t was clear that we had to limit the topics or qualify the topics to not offend
some people. Personally, I loved the rigorous discussions and found them very
engaging. But it was respectful, or at least we tried our best to be. It isn’t
perfect. But what is the goal? What are we trying to do?
We have maybe as many answers to this as we have atheist.
For me, as an ex-evangelical Christian, it is to point out the futility of their faith. I find it perfectly
We have maybe as many answers to this as we have atheist.
For me, as an ex-evangelical Christian, it is to point out the futility of their faith. I find it perfectly
Me as a Christian DJ, circa 1990 |
acceptable to ridicule someone that thinks
their make believe faith in something should be respected. But I know this isn’t
the way everyone wants to be, that is fine. I have many personal reasons for my
view. My past has brought me to this point and how I view religion is based
upon many years of seeking and study on the subject.
I have learned that many people raised in a secular family find the confrontationalist point of view to be quite aggressive. And for them, that is right. But there are many of us that are ‘victims” of the dogmatic indoctrination of religion. I respect those that want to take the quiet and gentle approach. To me, it isn’t a matter of A+ or A- or anything like that, it is a matter of making the idea of God less acceptable by a wide range of methods.
I agree with people that have different tactics than I do. But should I be marginalized because I like to confront adherents in their churches? Should I be ridiculed for thinking crosses all over the country are as offensive as seeing a hangman’s noose or a guillotine?
I have my point of view and it is different than yours, I get that but I also share the same goals and ideas. What is the “best” way to be an atheist?
I don’t know and neither do you.
What I do know is that I wish I had someone like me to help me come out of my religious delusion when I was entrenched in it. We need all of us. As I see it, by all means possible.
I have learned that many people raised in a secular family find the confrontationalist point of view to be quite aggressive. And for them, that is right. But there are many of us that are ‘victims” of the dogmatic indoctrination of religion. I respect those that want to take the quiet and gentle approach. To me, it isn’t a matter of A+ or A- or anything like that, it is a matter of making the idea of God less acceptable by a wide range of methods.
I agree with people that have different tactics than I do. But should I be marginalized because I like to confront adherents in their churches? Should I be ridiculed for thinking crosses all over the country are as offensive as seeing a hangman’s noose or a guillotine?
I have my point of view and it is different than yours, I get that but I also share the same goals and ideas. What is the “best” way to be an atheist?
I don’t know and neither do you.
What I do know is that I wish I had someone like me to help me come out of my religious delusion when I was entrenched in it. We need all of us. As I see it, by all means possible.